I
would place an advertisement in the local paper for one days work.
The work would consist of moving a pile of rocks from one location to
another, one by one. I am open to the idea of either having two store
fronts or two public locations to stage this piece. If, and when someone
applies for the days work, I would hire them to move the rocks and then
place a new ad in the paper to have them moved back to their original
location. The two sites for the rocks would have a black wooden frame in
the position that the rocks would be placed any participant that is
hired to move the rocks would be able to configure them however they
wish within the frame. By paralleling the Greek myth of Sisyphus to the
current state of the economy and jobs I hope To highlight the
desperation many qualified and ablebodied individuals face in their
search for work and the frustration many people face in work situations
where their individual efforts can seem repetitive and meaningless. By
using stone, I reference classical sculpture and architecture which
brings the current issues into a broader discourse surrounding the
worker throughout history, from slaves moving the massive rocks to build
the Pyramids to the current state of the worker. This piece also
highlights the fact that often credit for work by an individual is lost
to the ‘higher ups’ or brand, in this case the artist. By offering the
equivalent of one days minimum wage, it also calls attention to this
wage for peoples consideration. The theatrical nature of the piece
invites the public to engage in the piece that illustrates a big picture
issue in our society while offering a small amount of actual work into
the local economy. Even if the ad never receives a response, and the
rocks never move from one location to the next this piece invites the
public into the discourse through the physical piece, and by bringing it
into homes through the advertisement In the paper. A minimum time
period for this piece would be two weeks but I am open to having it run
through the course of this round of masters on main street. I can budget
$600 for this piece to cover the advertisement costs, moving supplies
for the rocks to be provided to one that might apply to move them, pay
for the worker that may apply to move the rocks and miscellaneous costs
that may occur.
I
am very excited about this collaboration between Masters on Main Street
and Occupy Wall Street and I think that many exciting projects could
help shed lights on the many facets of the movement.
MAYBE I agree with the context, but concerned about the sensativity of the people who are showing up to work to feed themselves and family becoming part of an "art" project. Rethink of a way to have the participants move the rocks from one side to the other for "play money" or a penny dolled out by a corporate Scrooge?
ReplyDeleteyes
ReplyDeleteNo.
ReplyDeleteAt first I was worried about this piece being offensive, but on reflection I am interested to see if it causes a stink.
ReplyDeletefind this "hiring" art offensive.
ReplyDeleteI agree it touches a nerve, which I can't think my way around. I would defer on this for now.
ReplyDeleteYes, if it was out-of-doors and artist covers all costs.
ReplyDeleteyes. think that clarification as to artistic nature of project in the ad might reduce insensitivity toward the worker...
ReplyDeletealso think that the arbitrariness of the action is strong, even without the advertisement. maybe one or several artists could do the work.
looking forward to discussing this one.
I think that the reaction many of you are having (as I did when I first read this) is right but the offensive nature of 'hiring' art and the arbitrary nature of the task is offensive for all the reasons that the state of our economy is offensive. The spark in this piece will stir conversation and I think that is fabulous.
ReplyDelete